Article by Sarah Leamon, Cannabis Life Network
The Canadian government has taken yet another small but essential step towards decriminalizing people who use drugs.
Earlier this week, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada quietly released new guidelines for prosecuting the illegal possession of controlled substances under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. They attempt to balance the well-documented realities of substance use with other public safety concerns associated with harmful criminal conduct, such as drug trafficking.
Simply put, these guidelines will help to take simple possession charges out of the criminal realm. They do so by encouraging prosecutors to pursue suitable alternatives to criminal prosecution for those who are charged with this offence.
Alternatives to prosecution including having an accused person engage in an alternative measures program or participate in restorative justice. Indigenous culture-based programming and peer support counselling initiatives are given explicit recognition in the guidelines. This, in itself, can be construed as an essential and positive step forward.
In determining the appropriate approach, the guidelines provide prosecutors with a number of factors to consider. They include the circumstances of the alleged offence and the offender. For example, the prosecutor is encouraged to consider whether the accused has a substance use disorder, or if they are currently subject to an order of the court. Ultimately, though, the guidelines serve to discourage the criminal prosecution of simple drug possession in nearly all circumstances – which does not mean all circumstances.
The guidelines do not do away with criminal prosecution for simple possession altogether. Simple possession offences will still be prosecuted where serious circumstances arise.
While this is somewhat open to interpretation, the guidelines offer some insight as to what this may mean. They are likely to include circumstances that pose a risk to the safety or well-being of others. This is particularly so where children other community members are affected. For example, if the offence is done in combination with the possession of a weapon or the operation of a motor vehicle, or if it occurred in a place that is known to be frequented by children. Offences alleged to have taken place in jails or other structured institutional facilities will also be treated more seriously.
Although these guidelines are not perfect, they are important. They offer a clear framework from which to approach these matters and serve as an unequivocal testament to our – albeit slowly – shifting cultural values.
They are also important due to the pivotal role that prosecutors play in our justice system. After all, prosecutors have a great deal of discretion. They have the power to determine which offences are prosecuted and which are not.
Prosecutors also tend to exercise their discretion independently. Their individual application of the law may vary according to policies and other guiding principles, and this can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For this reason, the establishment of federal guidelines in relation to this fundamental issue is both welcome and overdue.
But with the opioid crisis ongoing and the death toll still rising, many have asked why our government isn’t doing more, faster.
Many advocates have pushed for the total decriminalization of simple possession offences in Canada, citing evidence-based research on harm reduction which identifies this as an essential step in the protection of the public and drug users themselves.
The Canadian Association of the Chiefs of Police have even gotten on board. It recently endorsed the decriminalization of this offence, proposing increased access to health care, drug treatment and social services in lieu of criminal proceedings. Dr. Bonnie Henry has also weighed in, calling for decriminalization in response to the opioid-based public health emergency.