Article by Linley Sanders, Newsweek
Democrats in Massachusetts are pushing their state to become the first so-called sanctuary from marijuana prosecution as Attorney General Jeff Sessions pushes a crackdown on the legalized drug.
Legislation proposed in the Massachusetts House of Representatives would prohibit state and local police from contributing resources to marijuana-related investigations, said Massachusetts Representative David Rogers. He told Newsweek that the bill is in response to Sessions’s recent shift in an Obama-era policy that said The Justice Department would not interfere with marijuana businesses and use in states where it was allowed.
“The changed policy roiled the waters in these places where marijuana is legal,” Rogers said. “If the FBI or federal cops or the U.S. attorney want to pursue these cases perhaps that’s their prerogative, but they will get no help at all from state or local police.”
Rogers filed the bill, called the “Refusal of Compliance Act” alongside Democrat Representative Mike Connolly on January 19. The legislation is in early stages and still needs approval from Democrat-led committees as well as the Massachusetts Senate. If it is eventually approved, it would make Massachusetts the first state to be a sanctuary state for immigrants and marijuana.
There are nine states that have legalized recreational marijuana, but none have passed protections that would ban local law enforcement from assisting in federal intervention.
The U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Andrew Lelling was appointed by President Donald Trump. He has said his office will prioritize the region’s opioid crisis over federal marijuana enforcement but acknowledges that the industry could face scrutiny due to its “unambiguously illegal” status at the federal level, according to The Boston Herald.
“If you run into something that’s a priority for my office and the state and local police don’t want to be involved—say, immigration or marijuana—I can’t tell them what to do,” Lelling said. “I can ask for their help. But at the end of the day, if they don’t want to give it, then we’ll have to be on our own.”
The two largest cities in Massachusetts—Boston and Worcester—have already refused to favor Sessions’s federal law over the state and local laws. Rogers said it is important to codify those cities’ policy position to protect the other 349 cities and towns that have not committed to refusing assistance if The Justice Department decides to intervene in the state.
“I’m an open-minded person. If local law enforcement has concerns and wants to be able to cooperate in certain isolated incidents, I’m open to that conversation,” Rogers said. “But our largest cities have already said no to cooperation.”